翻訳と辞書 ・ Florence Township ・ Florence Township Memorial High School ・ Florence Township School District ・ Florence Township, Benton County, Iowa ・ Florence Township, Erie County, Ohio ・ Florence Township, Goodhue County, Minnesota ・ Florence Township, Michigan ・ Florence Township, New Jersey ・ Florence Township, Stephenson County, Illinois ・ Florence Township, Will County, Illinois ・ Florence Township, Williams County, Ohio ・ Florence Trevelyan ・ Florence Turner ・ Florence Udell ・ Florence Unified School District ・ Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders ・ Florence v. Shurtleff ・ Florence Vale ・ Florence Valentin ・ Florence van Straten ・ Florence Vere O'Brien ・ Florence Vidor ・ Florence Villa ・ Florence Violet McKenzie ・ Florence Wadham ・ Florence Wagon Works Site ・ Florence Wald ・ Florence Wambugu ・ Florence War Cemetery ・ Florence Ward Stiles
|
|
Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders : ウィキペディア英語版 | Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
''Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that officials may strip-search individuals who have been arrested for any crime before admitting the individuals to jail, even if there is no reason to suspect that the individual is carrying contraband.〔(Supreme Court Ruling Allows Strip Searches for Any Arrest ) Retrieved April 8, 2012.〕 == Background == Albert W. Florence was riding in a BMW sport-utility vehicle in New Jersey driven by his wife with their three children when she was pulled over for a traffic offense. The officer looked up Florence in the police computer database and discovered an outstanding warrant issued in Essex County. Florence had paid the fine, but the computer erroneously listed an outstanding warrant.〔 Florence was placed under arrest in Burlington County and spent six days in jail before being transferred to Essex County's jail. At both jails, custody officers "conducted a visual inspection of his body, instructing him to open his mouth, lift his tongue, lift his arms, and then lift his genitals."〔 Florence went before a judge and was quickly released from jail. Florence filed suit against the two jails under alleging that his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights had been violated.〔(Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Burlington et al. ) Retrieved April 8, 2012.〕 Florence argued that "persons arrested for minor offenses cannot be subjected to invasive ... (Fourth Amendment-unreasonable searches) ... searches unless prison officials have ... (Fourteenth Amendment-due process clause) ... reason to suspect concealment of weapons, drugs, or other contraband." A federal judge agreed. On appeal, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the "jails' interest in safety and security outweighed the privacy interests of detainees – even those accused of minor crimes."〔 The case was subsequently appealed to the United States Supreme Court; the Court granted ''certiorari'' on April 4, 2011.〔(Albert W. Florence, Petitioner v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington, et al. ) Retrieved April 8, 2012.〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|